The Core i9-10900KF is at least 2x faster gaming CPU than the FX-8320, however, it's a worse value for money, as it's $366.98 more expensive!
Advantages of the Core i9-10900KF
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 20 vs 8 threads
Advantages of the FX-8320
- Up to 78% cheaper – $102.02 vs $469.00
- A better value for money for gaming
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU as it has integrated graphics
Core i9-10900KF vs FX-8320 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i9-10900KF
Apr 30th, 2020
Average FPS
213
100%
Min 1% FPS
147
100%
Price, $
$469
21%
Value, $/FPS
$2.2/FPS
25%
Core i9-10900KF vs FX-8320 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i9-10900KF vs FX-8320 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i9-10900KF vs FX-8320 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i9-10900KF
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
10-core
100%
L3 Cache
20 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
100%
FX-8320
Oct 23rd, 2012
Cores
8-core
80%
L3 Cache
8 MB
40%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
95%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
75%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i9-10900KF | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | FX-8320 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
| $509.00 | MSRP | $169.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
| Comet Lake | Codename | Vishera |
| 125 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Performance | ||
10 | Cores | 8 |
20 | Threads | 8 |
3.7 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.5 GHz |
5.3 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 4.0 GHz |
20 MB | L3 Cache | 8 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR4 @ 2933 MHz | RAM | DDR3 |
| No | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
