In Rust, the Core i9-10900KF is slightly slower than the Core Ultra 9 285. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i9-10900KF
No clear advantages
Core Ultra 9 285
- Up to 18% faster in Rust – 284 vs 240 FPS
- Up to 18% faster in Rust
- Is 4 years and 8 months newer – Jan 14, 2025 vs Apr 30, 2020
- Is 4 years and 8 months newer
- Consumes up to 48% less energy – 65 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 48% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Rust FPS Calculator
Core i9-10900KF vs Core Ultra 9 285: Comparison of performance and price
Core Ultra 9 285
Jan 14th, 2025
Average FPS
284 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
94 FPS
100%
Price, $
$563.41
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.98/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i9-10900KF vs Core Ultra 9 285 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i9-10900KF vs Core Ultra 9 285 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i9-10900KF
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
10-core
42%
L3 Cache
20 MB
56%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.3 GHz
95%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
46%
Core Ultra 9 285
Jan 14th, 2025
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
68%
Turbo Frequency
5.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
6400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i9-10900KF Apr 30th, 2020 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core Ultra 9 285 Jan 14th, 2025 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Apr 30th, 2020 | Released | Jan 14th, 2025 |
$509.00 | MSRP | $579.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1200 | Socket | LGA1851 |
| 125 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2933 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 6400 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
