In Stray, the Core i9-10900KF is slightly slower than the Core Ultra 7 265F and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's $170 more expensive!
Core i9-10900KF
No clear advantages
Core Ultra 7 265F
- Up to 1% faster in Stray – 285 vs 283 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in Stray
- Is 4 years and 8 months newer – Jan 07, 2025 vs Apr 30, 2020
- Is 4 years and 8 months newer
- Up to 39% cheaper – $269.00 vs $439.00
- Up to 39% cheaper
- Up to 39% better value in Stray – $0.94 vs $1.55/FPS
- Up to 39% better value in Stray
- Consumes up to 48% less energy – 65 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 48% less energy
Stray FPS Calculator
Core i9-10900KF vs Core Ultra 7 265F: Comparison of performance and price
Core i9-10900KF
Apr 30th, 2020
Average FPS
283 FPS
99%
Min 1% FPS
191 FPS
94%
Price, $
$439
61%
Value, $/FPS
$1.55/FPS
61%
Core Ultra 7 265F
Jan 7th, 2025
Average FPS
285 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
203 FPS
100%
Price, $
$269
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.94/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i9-10900KF vs Core Ultra 7 265F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i9-10900KF vs Core Ultra 7 265F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i9-10900KF
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
10-core
50%
L3 Cache
20 MB
67%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
46%
Core Ultra 7 265F
Jan 7th, 2025
Cores
20-core
100%
L3 Cache
30 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
65%
Turbo Frequency
5.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
6400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i9-10900KF Apr 30th, 2020 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core Ultra 7 265F Jan 7th, 2025 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 7th, 2025 |
| $509.00 | MSRP | $379.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1200 | Socket | LGA1851 |
| 125W | Power Consumption | 65W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2933 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 6400 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
