Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900K outperforms the cheaper Core i9-10900KF on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i9-10900KF is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900K is 880 days newer than the cheaper Core i9-10900KF.
Advantages of Core i9-10900KF
- Up to 40% cheaper than Core i9-13900K - $292.57 vs $487.33
- Up to 35% better value when playing Forza Horizon 4 than Core i9-13900K - $0.92 vs $1.42 per FPS
Advantages of Core i9-13900K
- Performs up to 9% better in Forza Horizon 4 than Core i9-10900KF - 344 vs 317 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-10900KF - 32 vs 20 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Forza Horizon 4
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
317
92%
Value, $/FPS
$0.92/FPS
100%
Price, $
$292.57
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $292.57 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 47 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
344
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.42/FPS
65%
Price, $
$487.33
60%
FPS Winner
Buy for $487.33 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 47 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i9-10900KF | vs | Core i9-13900K |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i9 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 24 |
20 | Threads | 32 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |