In F1 25, the Core i9-10900KF is slightly faster than the Core i7-620M. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i9-10900KF
- Up to 7% faster in F1 25 – 183 vs 171 FPS
- Up to 7% faster in F1 25
- Is 10 years and 3 months newer – Apr 30, 2020 vs Jan 07, 2010
- Is 10 years and 3 months newer
Core i7-620M
- Consumes up to 72% less energy – 35 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 72% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
F1 25 FPS Calculator
Core i9-10900KF vs Core i7-620M: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i9-10900KF vs Core i7-620M in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i9-10900KF vs Core i7-620M in core CPU performance specifications
Core i9-10900KF
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
10-core
100%
L3 Cache
20 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
100%
Core i7-620M
Jan 7th, 2010
Cores
2-core
20%
L3 Cache
4 MB
20%
Base Frequency
2.677 GHz
72%
Turbo Frequency
3.333 GHz
63%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1066 MHz
36%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i9-10900KF Apr 30th, 2020 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-620M Jan 7th, 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Apr 30th, 2020 | Released | Jan 7th, 2010 |
| $509.00 | MSRP | $332.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Laptop |
| LGA1200 | Socket | Intel BGA 1288 |
| 125 W | Power Consumption | 35 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2933 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 1066 MHz (DDR3) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | HD Graphics (Ironlake) |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
