In Starfield, the Core i9-10900KF is slightly faster than the Core i5-L16G7. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i9-10900KF
- Up to 2% faster in Starfield – 93 vs 91 FPS
- Up to 2% faster in Starfield
Core i5-L16G7
- Is 1 month and 27 days newer – Jun 27, 2020 vs Apr 30, 2020
- Is 1 month and 27 days newer
- Consumes up to 94% less energy – 7 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 94% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Starfield FPS Calculator
Core i9-10900KF vs Core i5-L16G7: Comparison of performance and price
Core i9-10900KF
Apr 30th, 2020
Average FPS
93 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
58 FPS
100%
Price, $
$439
100%
Value, $/FPS
$4.72/FPS
100%
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i9-10900KF vs Core i5-L16G7 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i9-10900KF vs Core i5-L16G7 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i9-10900KF
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
10-core
100%
L3 Cache
20 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
69%
Core i5-L16G7
Jun 27th, 2020
Cores
5-core
50%
L3 Cache
4 MB
20%
Base Frequency
1.4 GHz
38%
Turbo Frequency
3 GHz
57%
Max. LPDDR4X RAM Speed
4267 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i9-10900KF Apr 30th, 2020 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-L16G7 Jun 27th, 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jun 27th, 2020 |
| $509.00 | MSRP | $281.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Laptop |
| LGA1200 | Socket | |
| 125W | Power Consumption | 7W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2933 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 4267 MHz (LPDDR4X) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 64EU |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
