In The Last of Us Part I, the Core i9-10900KF is slightly slower than the Core i5-7500T. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i9-10900KF
- Is 3 years and 3 months newer – Apr 30, 2020 vs Jan 03, 2017
- Is 3 years and 3 months newer
Core i5-7500T
- Up to 5% faster in The Last of Us Part I – 230 vs 220 FPS
- Up to 5% faster in The Last of Us Part I
- Consumes up to 72% less energy – 35 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 72% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
The Last of Us Part I FPS Calculator
Core i9-10900KF vs Core i5-7500T: Comparison of performance and price
Core i5-7500T
Jan 3rd, 2017
Average FPS
230 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
172 FPS
100%
Price, $
$130.43
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.56/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i9-10900KF vs Core i5-7500T in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i9-10900KF vs Core i5-7500T in core CPU performance specifications
Core i9-10900KF
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
10-core
100%
L3 Cache
20 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
100%
Core i5-7500T
Jan 3rd, 2017
Cores
4-core
40%
L3 Cache
6 MB
30%
Base Frequency
2.7 GHz
73%
Turbo Frequency
3.3 GHz
62%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
82%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i9-10900KF Apr 30th, 2020 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-7500T Jan 3rd, 2017 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Apr 30th, 2020 | Released | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
| $509.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1200 | Socket | LGA1151 |
| 125 W | Power Consumption | 35 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2933 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 2400 MHz (DDR4) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | HD 630 |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
