In The Last of Us Part II, the Core i9-10900KF is slower than the Core i5-650. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i9-10900KF
- Is 10 years and 3 months newer – Apr 30, 2020 vs Jan 07, 2010
- Is 10 years and 3 months newer
Core i5-650
- Up to 19% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 204 vs 171 FPS
- Up to 19% faster in The Last of Us Part II
- Consumes up to 42% less energy – 73 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 42% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Core i9-10900KF vs Core i5-650: Comparison of performance and price
Core i5-650
Jan 7th, 2010
Average FPS
204 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
153 FPS
100%
Price, $
$63.33
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.31/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i9-10900KF vs Core i5-650 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i9-10900KF vs Core i5-650 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i9-10900KF
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
10-core
100%
L3 Cache
20 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
100%
Core i5-650
Jan 7th, 2010
Cores
2-core
20%
L3 Cache
4 MB
20%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
86%
Turbo Frequency
3.466 GHz
65%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1333 MHz
45%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i9-10900KF Apr 30th, 2020 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-650 Jan 7th, 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Apr 30th, 2020 | Released | Jan 7th, 2010 |
| $509.00 | MSRP | $176.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1200 | Socket | LGA1156 |
| 125 W | Power Consumption | 73 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2933 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 1333 MHz (DDR3) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | Intel HD |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
