In Control, the Core i9-10900KF is slightly faster than the Core i3-330M. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i9-10900KF
- Up to 2% faster in Control – 250 vs 245 FPS
- Up to 2% faster in Control
- Is 10 years and 3 months newer – Apr 30, 2020 vs Jan 07, 2010
- Is 10 years and 3 months newer
Core i3-330M
- Consumes up to 72% less energy – 35 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 72% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Control FPS Calculator
Core i9-10900KF vs Core i3-330M: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-330M
Jan 7th, 2010
Average FPS
245 FPS
98%
Min 1% FPS
160 FPS
98%
Price, $
$98.95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.4/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i9-10900KF vs Core i3-330M in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i9-10900KF vs Core i3-330M in core CPU performance specifications
Core i9-10900KF
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
10-core
100%
L3 Cache
20 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
100%
Core i3-330M
Jan 7th, 2010
Cores
2-core
20%
L3 Cache
3 MB
15%
Base Frequency
2.133 GHz
58%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1066 MHz
36%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i9-10900KF Apr 30th, 2020 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i3-330M Jan 7th, 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Apr 30th, 2020 | Released | Jan 7th, 2010 |
| $509.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Laptop |
| LGA1200 | Socket | LGAG1 |
| 125 W | Power Consumption | 35 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2933 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 1066 MHz (DDR3) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
