In The Last of Us Part I, the Core i9-10900K is slightly slower than the Xeon E5630. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i9-10900K
- Is 10 years and 1 month newer – Apr 30, 2020 vs Mar 16, 2010
- Is 10 years and 1 month newer
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Xeon E5630
- Up to 11% faster in The Last of Us Part I – 245 vs 220 FPS
- Up to 11% faster in The Last of Us Part I
- Consumes up to 36% less energy – 80 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 36% less energy
The Last of Us Part I FPS Calculator
Core i9-10900K vs Xeon E5630: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i9-10900K vs Xeon E5630 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i9-10900K vs Xeon E5630 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i9-10900K
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
10-core
100%
L3 Cache
20 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
100%
Xeon E5630
Mar 16th, 2010
Cores
4-core
40%
L3 Cache
12 MB
60%
Base Frequency
2.533 GHz
68%
Turbo Frequency
2.8 GHz
53%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i9-10900K Apr 30th, 2020 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Xeon E5630 Mar 16th, 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2010 |
| $547.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| LGA1200 | Socket | LGA1366 |
| 125W | Power Consumption | 80W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2933 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | DDR3 |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
