In The Last of Us Part II, the Core i9-10900K is slightly faster than the Core i5-13400F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i9-10900K
- Up to 1% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 171 vs 169 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in The Last of Us Part II
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i5-13400F
- Is 2 years and 8 months newer – Jan 04, 2023 vs Apr 30, 2020
- Is 2 years and 8 months newer
- Consumes up to 48% less energy – 65 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 48% less energy
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Core i9-10900K vs Core i5-13400F: Comparison of performance and price
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i9-10900K vs Core i5-13400F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i9-10900K vs Core i5-13400F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i9-10900K
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
10-core
100%
L3 Cache
20 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
61%
Core i5-13400F
Jan 4th, 2023
Cores
10-core
100%
L3 Cache
20 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
68%
Turbo Frequency
4.6 GHz
87%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i9-10900K Apr 30th, 2020 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-13400F Jan 4th, 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Apr 30th, 2020 | Released | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| $547.00 | MSRP | $196.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1200 | Socket | LGA1700 |
| 125 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2933 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
