In Battlefield 6, the Core i9-10900F is slightly slower than the Ryzen 9 5950X. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i9-10900F
- Consumes up to 38% less energy – 65 vs 105 Watts
- Consumes up to 38% less energy
Ryzen 9 5950X
- Up to 17% faster in Battlefield 6 – 103 vs 88 FPS
- Up to 17% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 6 months and 6 days newer – Nov 05, 2020 vs Apr 30, 2020
- Is 6 months and 6 days newer
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Core i9-10900F vs Ryzen 9 5950X: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i9-10900F vs Ryzen 9 5950X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i9-10900F vs Ryzen 9 5950X in core CPU performance specifications
Core i9-10900F
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
10-core
62%
L3 Cache
20 MB
31%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
82%
Turbo Frequency
5.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
92%
Ryzen 9 5950X
Nov 5th, 2020
Cores
16-core
100%
L3 Cache
64 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.9 GHz
94%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i9-10900F Apr 30th, 2020 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen 9 5950X Nov 5th, 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Apr 30th, 2020 | Released | Nov 5th, 2020 |
$464.00 | MSRP | $799.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1200 | Socket | AM4 |
65 W | Power Consumption | 105 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2933 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
