The Core i9-10900F is a slightly faster gaming CPU than the Ryzen 7 3700X, however, it's a much worse value for money, as it's $166.09 more expensive!
Advantages of the Core i9-10900F
- A slightly faster CPU for gaming
Advantages of the Ryzen 7 3700X
- Up to 55% cheaper – $133.90 vs $299.99
- A much better value for money for gaming
Core i9-10900F vs Ryzen 7 3700X for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i9-10900F
Apr 30th, 2020
Average FPS
192
100%
Min 1% FPS
127
100%
Price, $
$299.99
44%
Value, $/FPS
$1.56/FPS
45%
Ryzen 7 3700X
Jul 7th, 2019
Average FPS
191
99%
Min 1% FPS
127
100%
Price, $
$133.9
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.7/FPS
100%
Core i9-10900F vs Ryzen 7 3700X in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i9-10900F vs Ryzen 7 3700X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i9-10900F vs Ryzen 7 3700X in core CPU performance specifications
Core i9-10900F
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
10-core
100%
L3 Cache
20 MB
62%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
78%
Turbo Frequency
5.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
92%
Ryzen 7 3700X
Jul 7th, 2019
Cores
8-core
80%
L3 Cache
32 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.4 GHz
85%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i9-10900F | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Ryzen 7 3700X |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
| $464.00 | MSRP | $329.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
| Comet Lake | Codename | Matisse |
| 65 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Performance | ||
10 | Cores | 8 |
20 | Threads | 16 |
| 2.8 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.6 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 4.4 GHz |
| 20 MB | L3 Cache | 32 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR4 @ 2933 MHz | RAM | DDR4 @ 3200 MHz |
| No | Integrated Graphics | No |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
