The Core i9-10900F is a slightly faster gaming CPU than the Ryzen 5 3500X, however, it's a much worse value for money, as it's $133.99 more expensive!
Advantages of the Core i9-10900F
- A slightly faster CPU for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 20 vs 6 threads
Advantages of the Ryzen 5 3500X
- Up to 52% cheaper – $125.00 vs $258.99
- A much better value for money for gaming
Core i9-10900F vs Ryzen 5 3500X for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i9-10900F
Apr 30th, 2020
Average FPS
192
100%
Min 1% FPS
127
100%
Price, $
$258.99
48%
Value, $/FPS
$1.34/FPS
49%
Ryzen 5 3500X
Sep 24th, 2019
Average FPS
189
98%
Min 1% FPS
125
98%
Price, $
$125
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.66/FPS
100%
Core i9-10900F vs Ryzen 5 3500X in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i9-10900F vs Ryzen 5 3500X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i9-10900F vs Ryzen 5 3500X in core CPU performance specifications
Core i9-10900F
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
10-core
100%
L3 Cache
20 MB
62%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
78%
Turbo Frequency
5.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
92%
Ryzen 5 3500X
Sep 24th, 2019
Cores
6-core
60%
L3 Cache
32 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.1 GHz
79%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i9-10900F | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Ryzen 5 3500X |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Sep 24th, 2019 |
$464.00 | MSRP | Not Available |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Matisse |
65 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
Performance | ||
10 | Cores | 6 |
20 | Threads | 6 |
2.8 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.6 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 4.1 GHz |
20 MB | L3 Cache | 32 MB |
Other Features | ||
DDR4 @ 2933 MHz | RAM | DDR4 @ 3200 MHz |
No | Integrated Graphics | No |
No | Overclockable | Yes |