In Battlefield 6, the Core i9-10900F is quite a bit faster than the Ryzen 5 3400G. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i9-10900F
- Up to 28% faster in Battlefield 6 – 88 vs 69 FPS
- Up to 28% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 9 months and 24 days newer – Apr 30, 2020 vs Jul 07, 2019
- Is 9 months and 24 days newer
Ryzen 5 3400G
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Core i9-10900F vs Ryzen 5 3400G: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Ryzen 5 3400G
Jul 7th, 2019
Average FPS
69 FPS
78%
Min 1% FPS
52 FPS
79%
Price, $
$88
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.27/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i9-10900F vs Ryzen 5 3400G in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i9-10900F vs Ryzen 5 3400G in core CPU performance specifications
Core i9-10900F
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
10-core
100%
L3 Cache
20 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
76%
Turbo Frequency
5.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
100%
Ryzen 5 3400G
Jul 7th, 2019
Cores
4-core
40%
L3 Cache
4 MB
20%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.2 GHz
81%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i9-10900F Apr 30th, 2020 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen 5 3400G Jul 7th, 2019 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Apr 30th, 2020 | Released | Jul 7th, 2019 |
| $464.00 | MSRP | $149.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1200 | Socket | AM4 |
| 65 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2933 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 2933 MHz (DDR4) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | Radeon RX Vega 11 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
