Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i7-13700K outperforms the more expensive Core i9-10900F on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i7-13700K is 880 days newer than the more expensive Core i9-10900F.
Advantages of Core i9-10900F
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i7-13700K - 65 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Core i7-13700K
- Performs up to 39% better in Far Cry 3 than Core i9-10900F - 212 vs 152 FPS
- Up to 50% cheaper than Core i9-10900F - $309.00 vs $616.96
- Up to 64% better value when playing Far Cry 3 than Core i9-10900F - $1.46 vs $4.06 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-10900F - 24 vs 20 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Far Cry 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $616.96 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 152 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
212
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.46/FPS
100%
Price, $
$309
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $309 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 152 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i9-10900F | vs | Core i7-13700K |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i7 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 16 |
20 | Threads | 24 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |