In Battlefield 6, the Core i9-10900F is slightly slower than the Core i5-1340P. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i9-10900F
No clear advantages
Core i5-1340P
- Up to 11% faster in Battlefield 6 – 98 vs 88 FPS
- Up to 11% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 2 years and 8 months newer – Jan 04, 2023 vs Apr 30, 2020
- Is 2 years and 8 months newer
- Consumes up to 57% less energy – 28 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 57% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Core i9-10900F vs Core i5-1340P: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i9-10900F vs Core i5-1340P in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i9-10900F vs Core i5-1340P in core CPU performance specifications
Core i9-10900F
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
10-core
83%
L3 Cache
20 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
56%
Core i5-1340P
Jan 4th, 2023
Cores
12-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
60%
Base Frequency
1.9 GHz
68%
Turbo Frequency
4.6 GHz
88%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i9-10900F Apr 30th, 2020 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-1340P Jan 4th, 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Apr 30th, 2020 | Released | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| $464.00 | MSRP | $353.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Laptop |
| LGA1200 | Socket | Intel BGA 1744 |
| 65 W | Power Consumption | 28 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2933 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5200 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | Iris Xe Graphics 80EU |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
