In Battlefield 6, the Core i9-10900 is slower than the Core i3-14100F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i9-10900
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i3-14100F
- Up to 19% faster in Battlefield 6 – 105 vs 88 FPS
- Up to 19% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 3 years and 8 months newer – Jan 08, 2024 vs Apr 30, 2020
- Is 3 years and 8 months newer
- Consumes up to 11% less energy – 58 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 11% less energy
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Core i9-10900 vs Core i3-14100F: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i3-14100F
Jan 8th, 2024
Average FPS
105 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
78 FPS
100%
Price, $
$96.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.92/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i9-10900 vs Core i3-14100F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i9-10900 vs Core i3-14100F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i9-10900
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
10-core
100%
L3 Cache
20 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
80%
Turbo Frequency
5.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
61%
Core i3-14100F
Jan 8th, 2024
Cores
4-core
40%
L3 Cache
12 MB
60%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.7 GHz
90%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i9-10900 Apr 30th, 2020 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i3-14100F Jan 8th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Apr 30th, 2020 | Released | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| $483.00 | MSRP | $109.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1200 | Socket | LGA1700 |
| 65 W | Power Consumption | 58 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2933 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
