In The Last of Us Part II, the Core i9-10850K is slightly slower than the Core i7-9700F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i9-10850K
- Is 1 year and 3 months newer – Jul 27, 2020 vs Apr 23, 2019
- Is 1 year and 3 months newer
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i7-9700F
- Up to 1% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 172 vs 171 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in The Last of Us Part II
- Consumes up to 48% less energy – 65 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 48% less energy
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Core i9-10850K vs Core i7-9700F: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i7-9700F
Apr 23rd, 2019
Average FPS
172 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
129 FPS
100%
Price, $
$247.3
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.43/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i9-10850K vs Core i7-9700F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i9-10850K vs Core i7-9700F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i9-10850K
Jul 27th, 2020
Cores
10-core
100%
L3 Cache
20 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
100%
Core i7-9700F
Apr 23rd, 2019
Cores
8-core
80%
L3 Cache
12 MB
60%
Base Frequency
3 GHz
83%
Turbo Frequency
4.7 GHz
90%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
91%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i9-10850K Jul 27th, 2020 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-9700F Apr 23rd, 2019 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jul 27th, 2020 | Released | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
| – | MSRP | $333.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1200 | Socket | LGA1151 |
| 125 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2933 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
