Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i7-13700F outperforms the more expensive Core i9-10850K on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i7-13700F is 891 days newer than the more expensive Core i9-10850K.
Advantages of Core i9-10850K
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-13700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i7-13700F
- Performs up to 7% better in The Last of Us Part I than Core i9-10850K - 147 vs 138 FPS
- Up to 11% cheaper than Core i9-10850K - $267.00 vs $299.00
- Up to 16% better value when playing The Last of Us Part I than Core i9-10850K - $1.82 vs $2.17 per FPS
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $299 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 130 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
147
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.82/FPS
100%
Price, $
$267
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $267 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 129 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2020
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i9-10850K | vs | Core i7-13700F |
---|---|---|
Jul 27th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i7 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 16 |
20 | Threads | 24 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
125 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |