In Atomfall, the Core i9-10850K is slightly slower than the Core i5-14400F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i9-10850K
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i5-14400F
- Up to 5% faster in Atomfall – 233 vs 221 FPS
- Up to 5% faster in Atomfall
- Is 3 years and 5 months newer – Jan 08, 2024 vs Jul 27, 2020
- Is 3 years and 5 months newer
- Consumes up to 48% less energy – 65 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 48% less energy
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i9-10850K vs Core i5-14400F: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i9-10850K vs Core i5-14400F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i9-10850K vs Core i5-14400F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i9-10850K
Jul 27th, 2020
Cores
10-core
100%
L3 Cache
20 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
61%
Core i5-14400F
Jan 8th, 2024
Cores
10-core
100%
L3 Cache
20 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
69%
Turbo Frequency
4.7 GHz
90%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i9-10850K Jul 27th, 2020 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-14400F Jan 8th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jul 27th, 2020 | Released | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| – | MSRP | $196.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1200 | Socket | LGA1700 |
| 125 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2933 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
