In Atomfall, the Core i9-10850K is faster than the Core i3-330M. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i9-10850K
- Up to 20% faster in Atomfall – 220 vs 183 FPS
- Up to 20% faster in Atomfall
- Is 10 years and 6 months newer – Jul 27, 2020 vs Jan 07, 2010
- Is 10 years and 6 months newer
Core i3-330M
- Consumes up to 72% less energy – 35 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 72% less energy
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i9-10850K vs Core i3-330M: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i3-330M
Jan 7th, 2010
Average FPS
183 FPS
83%
Min 1% FPS
137 FPS
83%
Price, $
$98.95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.54/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i9-10850K vs Core i3-330M in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i9-10850K vs Core i3-330M in core CPU performance specifications
Core i9-10850K
Jul 27th, 2020
Cores
10-core
100%
L3 Cache
20 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
100%
Core i3-330M
Jan 7th, 2010
Cores
2-core
20%
L3 Cache
3 MB
15%
Base Frequency
2.133 GHz
59%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1066 MHz
36%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i9-10850K Jul 27th, 2020 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i3-330M Jan 7th, 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jul 27th, 2020 | Released | Jan 7th, 2010 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Laptop |
| LGA1200 | Socket | LGAG1 |
| 125 W | Power Consumption | 35 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2933 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 1066 MHz (DDR3) |
| UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated GPU | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
