In Atomfall, the Core i7-9800X is slightly slower than the Core Ultra 9 275HX. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i7-9800X
No clear advantages
Core Ultra 9 275HX
- Up to 16% faster in Atomfall – 246 vs 212 FPS
- Up to 16% faster in Atomfall
- Is 6 years and 2 months newer – Jan 13, 2025 vs Oct 19, 2018
- Is 6 years and 2 months newer
- Consumes up to 67% less energy – 55 vs 165 Watts
- Consumes up to 67% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i7-9800X vs Core Ultra 9 275HX: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-9800X
Oct 19th, 2018
Average FPS
212 FPS
86%
Min 1% FPS
159 FPS
86%
Price, $
$768.88
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.62/FPS
100%
Core Ultra 9 275HX
Jan 13th, 2025
Average FPS
246 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
184 FPS
100%
Price, $
...
Value, $/FPS
...
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-9800X vs Core Ultra 9 275HX in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-9800X vs Core Ultra 9 275HX in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-9800X
Oct 19th, 2018
Cores
8-core
33%
L3 Cache
16.5 MB
46%
Base Frequency
3.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.5 GHz
83%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
42%
Core Ultra 9 275HX
Jan 13th, 2025
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.7 GHz
71%
Turbo Frequency
5.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
6400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-9800X Oct 19th, 2018 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core Ultra 9 275HX Jan 13th, 2025 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Jan 13th, 2025 |
| $589.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Laptop |
| LGA2066 | Socket | Intel BGA 2114 |
| 165W | Power Consumption | 55W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 6400 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU |
| Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
