In Atomfall, the Core i7-9800X is slightly slower than the Core Ultra 7 265F and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's $481 more expensive!
Core i7-9800X
No clear advantages
Core Ultra 7 265F
- Up to 15% faster in Atomfall – 245 vs 213 FPS
- Up to 15% faster in Atomfall
- Is 6 years and 2 months newer – Jan 07, 2025 vs Oct 19, 2018
- Is 6 years and 2 months newer
- Up to 63% cheaper – $288.00 vs $768.88
- Up to 63% cheaper
- Up to 68% better value in Atomfall – $1.17 vs $3.60/FPS
- Up to 68% better value in Atomfall
- Consumes up to 61% less energy – 65 vs 165 Watts
- Consumes up to 61% less energy
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i7-9800X vs Core Ultra 7 265F: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-9800X
Oct 19th, 2018
Average FPS
213 FPS
87%
Min 1% FPS
160 FPS
87%
Price, $
$768.88
37%
Value, $/FPS
$3.6/FPS
32%
Core Ultra 7 265F
Jan 7th, 2025
Average FPS
245 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
184 FPS
100%
Price, $
$288
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.17/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-9800X vs Core Ultra 7 265F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-9800X vs Core Ultra 7 265F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-9800X
Oct 19th, 2018
Cores
8-core
40%
L3 Cache
16.5 MB
55%
Base Frequency
3.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.5 GHz
85%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
42%
Core Ultra 7 265F
Jan 7th, 2025
Cores
20-core
100%
L3 Cache
30 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
63%
Turbo Frequency
5.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
6400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-9800X Oct 19th, 2018 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core Ultra 7 265F Jan 7th, 2025 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 19th, 2018 | Released | Jan 7th, 2025 |
| $589.00 | MSRP | $379.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA2066 | Socket | LGA1851 |
| 165 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 6400 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
