In Starfield, the Core i7-9750HF is slightly slower than the Ryzen Threadripper 1950X. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i7-9750HF
- Is 1 year and 8 months newer – Apr 23, 2019 vs Aug 10, 2017
- Is 1 year and 8 months newer
- Consumes up to 75% less energy – 45 vs 180 Watts
- Consumes up to 75% less energy
Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
- Up to 1% faster in Starfield – 92 vs 91 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in Starfield
Starfield FPS Calculator
Core i7-9750HF vs Ryzen Threadripper 1950X: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
Aug 10th, 2017
Average FPS
92 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
54 FPS
100%
Price, $
$850
100%
Value, $/FPS
$9.23/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-9750HF vs Ryzen Threadripper 1950X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-9750HF vs Ryzen Threadripper 1950X in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-9750HF
Apr 23rd, 2019
Cores
6-core
38%
L3 Cache
12 MB
38%
Base Frequency
2.6 GHz
76%
Turbo Frequency
4.5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
Aug 10th, 2017
Cores
16-core
100%
L3 Cache
32 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
89%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-9750HF Apr 23rd, 2019 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen Threadripper 1950X Aug 10th, 2017 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
| – | MSRP | $999.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1440 | Socket | SP3r2 |
45W | Power Consumption | 180W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
