In Atomfall, the Core i7-9750HF is slightly slower than the Core Ultra 9 285. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i7-9750HF
- Consumes up to 31% less energy – 45 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 31% less energy
Core Ultra 9 285
- Up to 18% faster in Atomfall – 248 vs 210 FPS
- Up to 18% faster in Atomfall
- Is 5 years and 8 months newer – Jan 14, 2025 vs Apr 23, 2019
- Is 5 years and 8 months newer
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i7-9750HF vs Core Ultra 9 285: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core Ultra 9 285
Jan 14th, 2025
Average FPS
248 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
186 FPS
100%
Price, $
$563.41
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.27/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-9750HF vs Core Ultra 9 285 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-9750HF vs Core Ultra 9 285 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-9750HF
Apr 23rd, 2019
Cores
6-core
25%
L3 Cache
12 MB
33%
Base Frequency
2.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.5 GHz
80%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
42%
Core Ultra 9 285
Jan 14th, 2025
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
96%
Turbo Frequency
5.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
6400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-9750HF Apr 23rd, 2019 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core Ultra 9 285 Jan 14th, 2025 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Apr 23rd, 2019 | Released | Jan 14th, 2025 |
| – | MSRP | $579.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1440 | Socket | LGA1851 |
45 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 6400 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
