In Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020, the Core i7-9750HF is slower than the Core i9-12900K. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i7-9750HF
- Consumes up to 64% less energy – 45 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 64% less energy
Core i9-12900K
- Up to 24% faster in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 – 125 vs 101 FPS
- Up to 24% faster in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
- Is 2 years and 6 months newer – Nov 04, 2021 vs Apr 23, 2019
- Is 2 years and 6 months newer
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 FPS Calculator
Core i7-9750HF vs Core i9-12900K: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i9-12900K
Nov 4th, 2021
Average FPS
125 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
94 FPS
100%
Price, $
$299.93
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.39/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-9750HF vs Core i9-12900K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-9750HF vs Core i9-12900K in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-9750HF
Apr 23rd, 2019
Cores
6-core
38%
L3 Cache
12 MB
40%
Base Frequency
2.6 GHz
81%
Turbo Frequency
4.5 GHz
87%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
56%
Core i9-12900K
Nov 4th, 2021
Cores
16-core
100%
L3 Cache
30 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-9750HF Apr 23rd, 2019 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-12900K Nov 4th, 2021 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
| – | MSRP | $599.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1440 | Socket | LGA1700 |
45W | Power Consumption | 125W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 770 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
