In Atomfall, the Core i7-9700T is slightly slower than the Core Ultra 7 265 and it's also a worse value for money, as it's $46 more expensive!
Core i7-9700T
- Consumes up to 46% less energy – 35 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 46% less energy
Core Ultra 7 265
- Up to 16% faster in Atomfall – 245 vs 211 FPS
- Up to 16% faster in Atomfall
- Is 5 years and 8 months newer – Jan 07, 2025 vs Apr 23, 2019
- Is 5 years and 8 months newer
- Up to 12% cheaper – $348.52 vs $394.28
- Up to 12% cheaper
- Up to 24% better value in Atomfall – $1.42 vs $1.86/FPS
- Up to 24% better value in Atomfall
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i7-9700T vs Core Ultra 7 265: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-9700T
Apr 23rd, 2019
Average FPS
211 FPS
86%
Min 1% FPS
158 FPS
86%
Price, $
$394.28
88%
Value, $/FPS
$1.86/FPS
76%
Core Ultra 7 265
Jan 7th, 2025
Average FPS
245 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
184 FPS
100%
Price, $
$348.52
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.42/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-9700T vs Core Ultra 7 265 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-9700T vs Core Ultra 7 265 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-9700T
Apr 23rd, 2019
Cores
8-core
40%
L3 Cache
12 MB
40%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
83%
Turbo Frequency
4.3 GHz
81%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
42%
Core Ultra 7 265
Jan 7th, 2025
Cores
20-core
100%
L3 Cache
30 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
6400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-9700T Apr 23rd, 2019 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core Ultra 7 265 Jan 7th, 2025 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Apr 23rd, 2019 | Released | Jan 7th, 2025 |
$323.00 | MSRP | $394.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1851 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 6400 MHz (DDR5) |
| UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated GPU | Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 32EU |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
