In Atomfall, the Core i7-9700T is slightly slower than the Core Ultra 5 235 and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's $117 more expensive!
Core i7-9700T
- Consumes up to 46% less energy – 35 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 46% less energy
Core Ultra 5 235
- Up to 16% faster in Atomfall – 243 vs 210 FPS
- Up to 16% faster in Atomfall
- Is 5 years and 8 months newer – Jan 07, 2025 vs Apr 23, 2019
- Is 5 years and 8 months newer
- Up to 30% cheaper – $277.30 vs $394.28
- Up to 30% cheaper
- Up to 39% better value in Atomfall – $1.14 vs $1.87/FPS
- Up to 39% better value in Atomfall
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i7-9700T vs Core Ultra 5 235: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-9700T
Apr 23rd, 2019
Average FPS
210 FPS
86%
Min 1% FPS
157 FPS
86%
Price, $
$394.28
70%
Value, $/FPS
$1.87/FPS
61%
Core Ultra 5 235
Jan 7th, 2025
Average FPS
243 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
182 FPS
100%
Price, $
$277.3
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.14/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-9700T vs Core Ultra 5 235 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-9700T vs Core Ultra 5 235 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-9700T
Apr 23rd, 2019
Cores
8-core
57%
L3 Cache
12 MB
50%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
59%
Turbo Frequency
4.3 GHz
86%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
42%
Core Ultra 5 235
Jan 7th, 2025
Cores
14-core
100%
L3 Cache
24 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
6400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-9700T Apr 23rd, 2019 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core Ultra 5 235 Jan 7th, 2025 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Apr 23rd, 2019 | Released | Jan 7th, 2025 |
| $323.00 | MSRP | $257.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1851 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 6400 MHz (DDR5) |
| UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated GPU | Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 24EU |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
