In Rust, the Core i7-9700T is slower than the Core i9-13900. However, it's a better value for money, as it's $183 cheaper!
Core i7-9700T
- Up to 32% cheaper – $394.28 vs $576.99
- Up to 32% cheaper
- Up to 17% better value in Rust – $1.74 vs $2.09/FPS
- Up to 17% better value in Rust
- Consumes up to 46% less energy – 35 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 46% less energy
Core i9-13900
- Up to 22% faster in Rust – 275 vs 226 FPS
- Up to 22% faster in Rust
- Is 3 years and 8 months newer – Jan 04, 2023 vs Apr 23, 2019
- Is 3 years and 8 months newer
Rust FPS Calculator
Core i7-9700T vs Core i9-13900: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-9700T
Apr 23rd, 2019
Average FPS
226 FPS
82%
Min 1% FPS
55 FPS
62%
Price, $
$394.28
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.74/FPS
100%
Core i9-13900
Jan 4th, 2023
Average FPS
275 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
88 FPS
100%
Price, $
$576.99
68%
Value, $/FPS
$2.09/FPS
83%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-9700T vs Core i9-13900 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-9700T vs Core i9-13900 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-9700T
Apr 23rd, 2019
Cores
8-core
33%
L3 Cache
12 MB
33%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.3 GHz
77%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
48%
Core i9-13900
Jan 4th, 2023
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-9700T Apr 23rd, 2019 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-13900 Jan 4th, 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Apr 23rd, 2019 | Released | Jan 4th, 2023 |
$323.00 | MSRP | $549.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1700 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
| UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 770 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
