In Atomfall, the Core i7-9700T is slightly slower than the Core i9-12900K and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's $105 more expensive!
Core i7-9700T
- Consumes up to 72% less energy – 35 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 72% less energy
Core i9-12900K
- Up to 13% faster in Atomfall – 239 vs 211 FPS
- Up to 13% faster in Atomfall
- Is 2 years and 6 months newer – Nov 04, 2021 vs Apr 23, 2019
- Is 2 years and 6 months newer
- Up to 27% cheaper – $289.00 vs $394.28
- Up to 27% cheaper
- Up to 35% better value in Atomfall – $1.20 vs $1.86/FPS
- Up to 35% better value in Atomfall
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i7-9700T vs Core i9-12900K: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-9700T
Apr 23rd, 2019
Average FPS
211 FPS
88%
Min 1% FPS
158 FPS
88%
Price, $
$394.28
73%
Value, $/FPS
$1.86/FPS
65%
Core i9-12900K
Nov 4th, 2021
Average FPS
239 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
179 FPS
100%
Price, $
$289
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.2/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-9700T vs Core i9-12900K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-9700T vs Core i9-12900K in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-9700T
Apr 23rd, 2019
Cores
8-core
50%
L3 Cache
12 MB
40%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
62%
Turbo Frequency
4.3 GHz
83%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
56%
Core i9-12900K
Nov 4th, 2021
Cores
16-core
100%
L3 Cache
30 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-9700T Apr 23rd, 2019 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-12900K Nov 4th, 2021 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Apr 23rd, 2019 | Released | Nov 4th, 2021 |
$323.00 | MSRP | $599.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1700 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) |
| UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 770 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
