In Battlefield V, the Core i7-9700T is slightly slower than the Core i7-9700F and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's $151 more expensive!
Core i7-9700T
- Consumes up to 46% less energy – 35 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 46% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i7-9700F
- Up to 2% faster in Battlefield V – 235 vs 230 FPS
- Up to 2% faster in Battlefield V
- Up to 35% cheaper – $279.00 vs $430.29
- Up to 35% cheaper
- Up to 37% better value in Battlefield V – $1.18 vs $1.87/FPS
- Up to 37% better value in Battlefield V
Battlefield V FPS Calculator
Core i7-9700T vs Core i7-9700F: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-9700T
Apr 23rd, 2019
Average FPS
230 FPS
98%
Min 1% FPS
164 FPS
97%
Price, $
$430.29
64%
Value, $/FPS
$1.87/FPS
63%
Core i7-9700F
Apr 23rd, 2019
Average FPS
235 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
169 FPS
100%
Price, $
$279
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.18/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-9700T vs Core i7-9700F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-9700T vs Core i7-9700F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-9700T
Apr 23rd, 2019
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
67%
Turbo Frequency
4.3 GHz
91%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Core i7-9700F
Apr 23rd, 2019
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-9700T Apr 23rd, 2019 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-9700F Apr 23rd, 2019 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
$323.00 | MSRP | $333.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1151 |
35W | Power Consumption | 65W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
