In The Last of Us Part II, the Core i7-9700T is slightly slower than the Core i7-640M. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i7-9700T
- Is 8 years and 6 months newer – Apr 23, 2019 vs Sep 26, 2010
- Is 8 years and 6 months newer
Core i7-640M
- Up to 14% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 198 vs 174 FPS
- Up to 14% faster in The Last of Us Part II
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Core i7-9700T vs Core i7-640M: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-9700T
Apr 23rd, 2019
Average FPS
174 FPS
88%
Min 1% FPS
131 FPS
88%
Price, $
$394.28
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.26/FPS
100%
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-9700T vs Core i7-640M in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-9700T vs Core i7-640M in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-9700T
Apr 23rd, 2019
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
71%
Turbo Frequency
4.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Core i7-640M
Sep 26th, 2010
Cores
2-core
25%
L3 Cache
4 MB
33%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.467 GHz
81%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1066 MHz
40%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-9700T Apr 23rd, 2019 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-640M Sep 26th, 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Released | Sep 26th, 2010 |
$323.00 | MSRP | $346.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Laptop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | Intel BGA 1288 |
| 35 W | Power Consumption | 35 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 1066 MHz (DDR3) |
| UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated GPU | HD Graphics (Ironlake) |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
