In Atomfall, the Core i7-9700T is slightly faster than the Core i7-4712MQ. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i7-9700T
- Up to 5% faster in Atomfall – 209 vs 199 FPS
- Up to 5% faster in Atomfall
- Is 6 years and 8 days newer – Apr 23, 2019 vs Apr 14, 2013
- Is 6 years and 8 days newer
- Consumes up to 5% less energy – 35 vs 37 Watts
- Consumes up to 5% less energy
Core i7-4712MQ
No clear advantages
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i7-9700T vs Core i7-4712MQ: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-9700T vs Core i7-4712MQ in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-9700T vs Core i7-4712MQ in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-9700T
Apr 23rd, 2019
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
87%
Turbo Frequency
4.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Core i7-4712MQ
Apr 14th, 2013
Cores
4-core
50%
L3 Cache
6 MB
50%
Base Frequency
2.3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.3 GHz
77%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
60%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-9700T Apr 23rd, 2019 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-4712MQ Apr 14th, 2013 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Released | Apr 14th, 2013 |
$323.00 | MSRP | $378.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Laptop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGAG3 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 37 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 1600 MHz (DDR3) |
| UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated GPU | Intel HD 4600 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
