In Rust, the Core i7-9700T is slightly faster than the Core i7-2635QM. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i7-9700T
- Up to 8% faster in Rust – 226 vs 209 FPS
- Up to 8% faster in Rust
- Is 8 years and 3 months newer – Apr 23, 2019 vs Jan 03, 2011
- Is 8 years and 3 months newer
- Consumes up to 22% less energy – 35 vs 45 Watts
- Consumes up to 22% less energy
Core i7-2635QM
No clear advantages
Rust FPS Calculator
Core i7-9700T vs Core i7-2635QM: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-9700T
Apr 23rd, 2019
Average FPS
226 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
54 FPS
100%
Price, $
$394.28
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.74/FPS
100%
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-9700T vs Core i7-2635QM in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-9700T vs Core i7-2635QM in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-9700T
Apr 23rd, 2019
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Core i7-2635QM
Jan 3rd, 2011
Cores
4-core
50%
L3 Cache
6 MB
50%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
2.9 GHz
67%
Max. unknown RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-9700T Apr 23rd, 2019 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-2635QM Jan 3rd, 2011 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Released | Jan 3rd, 2011 |
| $323.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Laptop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | Intel BGA 1224 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 45 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | unknown |
| UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated GPU | Intel HD 3000 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
