In Battlefield 6, the Core i7-9700T is slightly slower than the Core i7-10700K and it's also a worse value for money, as it's $50 more expensive!
Core i7-9700T
- Consumes up to 72% less energy – 35 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 72% less energy
Core i7-10700K
- Up to 13% faster in Battlefield 6 – 86 vs 76 FPS
- Up to 13% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 1 year and 7 days newer – Apr 30, 2020 vs Apr 23, 2019
- Is 1 year and 7 days newer
- Up to 12% cheaper – $380.00 vs $430.29
- Up to 12% cheaper
- Up to 22% better value in Battlefield 6 – $4.41 vs $5.66/FPS
- Up to 22% better value in Battlefield 6
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Core i7-9700T vs Core i7-10700K: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-9700T
Apr 23rd, 2019
Average FPS
76 FPS
88%
Min 1% FPS
57 FPS
89%
Price, $
$430.29
88%
Value, $/FPS
$5.66/FPS
78%
Core i7-10700K
Apr 30th, 2020
Average FPS
86 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
64 FPS
100%
Price, $
$380
100%
Value, $/FPS
$4.41/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-9700T vs Core i7-10700K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-9700T vs Core i7-10700K in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-9700T
Apr 23rd, 2019
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
75%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
53%
Turbo Frequency
4.3 GHz
84%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
91%
Core i7-10700K
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.1 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-9700T Apr 23rd, 2019 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-10700K Apr 30th, 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| $323.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1200 |
35W | Power Consumption | 125W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 2933 MHz (DDR4) |
| UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 630 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
