In Atomfall, the Core i7-9700T is slightly slower than the Core i5-9600K and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's $246 more expensive!
Core i7-9700T
- Is 6 months and 3 days newer – Apr 23, 2019 vs Oct 19, 2018
- Is 6 months and 3 days newer
- Consumes up to 63% less energy – 35 vs 95 Watts
- Consumes up to 63% less energy
Core i5-9600K
- Up to 1% faster in Atomfall – 214 vs 211 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in Atomfall
- Up to 62% cheaper – $148.09 vs $394.28
- Up to 62% cheaper
- Up to 63% better value in Atomfall – $0.69 vs $1.86/FPS
- Up to 63% better value in Atomfall
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i7-9700T vs Core i5-9600K: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-9700T
Apr 23rd, 2019
Average FPS
211 FPS
99%
Min 1% FPS
158 FPS
99%
Price, $
$394.28
37%
Value, $/FPS
$1.86/FPS
37%
Core i5-9600K
Oct 19th, 2018
Average FPS
214 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
160 FPS
100%
Price, $
$148.09
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.69/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-9700T vs Core i5-9600K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-9700T vs Core i5-9600K in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-9700T
Apr 23rd, 2019
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
54%
Turbo Frequency
4.3 GHz
93%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Core i5-9600K
Oct 19th, 2018
Cores
6-core
75%
L3 Cache
9 MB
75%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-9700T Apr 23rd, 2019 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-9600K Oct 19th, 2018 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Released | Oct 19th, 2018 |
| $323.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1151 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 95 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
| UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated GPU | UHD 630 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
