In The Last of Us Part II, the Core i7-9700T is slightly slower than the Core i5-7500T and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's $264 more expensive!
Core i7-9700T
- Is 2 years and 3 months newer – Apr 23, 2019 vs Jan 03, 2017
- Is 2 years and 3 months newer
Core i5-7500T
- Up to 3% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 180 vs 175 FPS
- Up to 3% faster in The Last of Us Part II
- Up to 67% cheaper – $130.43 vs $394.28
- Up to 67% cheaper
- Up to 68% better value in The Last of Us Part II – $0.72 vs $2.25/FPS
- Up to 68% better value in The Last of Us Part II
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Core i7-9700T vs Core i5-7500T: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-9700T
Apr 23rd, 2019
Average FPS
175 FPS
97%
Min 1% FPS
131 FPS
97%
Price, $
$394.28
33%
Value, $/FPS
$2.25/FPS
32%
Core i5-7500T
Jan 3rd, 2017
Average FPS
180 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
135 FPS
100%
Price, $
$130.43
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.72/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-9700T vs Core i5-7500T in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-9700T vs Core i5-7500T in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-9700T
Apr 23rd, 2019
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
74%
Turbo Frequency
4.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Core i5-7500T
Jan 3rd, 2017
Cores
4-core
50%
L3 Cache
6 MB
50%
Base Frequency
2.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.3 GHz
77%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
90%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-9700T Apr 23rd, 2019 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-7500T Jan 3rd, 2017 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Released | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
| $323.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1151 |
| 35 W | Power Consumption | 35 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 2400 MHz (DDR4) |
| UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated GPU | HD 630 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
