In The Last of Us Part II, the Core i7-9700T is slightly slower than the Core i5-2400S and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's $209 more expensive!
Core i7-9700T
- Is 8 years and 3 months newer – Apr 23, 2019 vs Jan 09, 2011
- Is 8 years and 3 months newer
- Consumes up to 46% less energy – 35 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 46% less energy
Core i5-2400S
- Up to 14% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 199 vs 175 FPS
- Up to 14% faster in The Last of Us Part II
- Up to 53% cheaper – $184.83 vs $394.28
- Up to 53% cheaper
- Up to 59% better value in The Last of Us Part II – $0.92 vs $2.25/FPS
- Up to 59% better value in The Last of Us Part II
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Core i7-9700T vs Core i5-2400S: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-9700T
Apr 23rd, 2019
Average FPS
175 FPS
88%
Min 1% FPS
131 FPS
88%
Price, $
$394.28
46%
Value, $/FPS
$2.25/FPS
41%
Core i5-2400S
Jan 9th, 2011
Average FPS
199 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
149 FPS
100%
Price, $
$184.83
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.92/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-9700T vs Core i5-2400S in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-9700T vs Core i5-2400S in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-9700T
Apr 23rd, 2019
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
80%
Turbo Frequency
4.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Core i5-2400S
Jan 9th, 2011
Cores
4-core
50%
L3 Cache
6 MB
50%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.3 GHz
77%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-9700T Apr 23rd, 2019 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-2400S Jan 9th, 2011 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Released | Jan 9th, 2011 |
| $323.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1155 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | DDR3 |
| UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated GPU | Intel HD 2000 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
