In Rust, the Core i7-9700T is slightly faster than the Core i3-9100F. However, it's a much worse value for money, as it's $305 more expensive!
Core i7-9700T
- Up to 1% faster in Rust – 226 vs 224 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in Rust
- Consumes up to 46% less energy – 35 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 46% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i3-9100F
- Up to 77% cheaper – $89.57 vs $394.28
- Up to 77% cheaper
- Up to 78% better value in Rust – $0.39 vs $1.74/FPS
- Up to 78% better value in Rust
Rust FPS Calculator
Core i7-9700T vs Core i3-9100F: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-9700T
Apr 23rd, 2019
Average FPS
226 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
55 FPS
100%
Price, $
$394.28
22%
Value, $/FPS
$1.74/FPS
22%
Core i3-9100F
Apr 23rd, 2019
Average FPS
224 FPS
99%
Min 1% FPS
54 FPS
98%
Price, $
$89.57
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.39/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-9700T vs Core i3-9100F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-9700T vs Core i3-9100F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-9700T
Apr 23rd, 2019
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
56%
Turbo Frequency
4.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Core i3-9100F
Apr 23rd, 2019
Cores
4-core
50%
L3 Cache
6 MB
50%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.2 GHz
98%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
90%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-9700T Apr 23rd, 2019 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i3-9100F Apr 23rd, 2019 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Apr 23rd, 2019 | Released | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
| $323.00 | MSRP | $122.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1151 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 2400 MHz (DDR4) |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
