In Control, the Core i7-9700T is same performance as the Core i3-8100. However, it's a much worse value for money, as it's $274 more expensive!
Core i7-9700T
- Is 1 year and 6 months newer – Apr 23, 2019 vs Oct 05, 2017
- Is 1 year and 6 months newer
- Consumes up to 46% less energy – 35 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 46% less energy
Core i3-8100
- Up to 69% cheaper – $120.32 vs $394.28
- Up to 69% cheaper
- Up to 70% better value in Control – $0.48 vs $1.58/FPS
- Up to 70% better value in Control
Control FPS Calculator
Core i7-9700T vs Core i3-8100: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-9700T
Apr 23rd, 2019
Average FPS
248 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
163 FPS
100%
Price, $
$394.28
30%
Value, $/FPS
$1.58/FPS
30%
Core i3-8100
Oct 5th, 2017
Average FPS
248 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
162 FPS
99%
Price, $
$120.32
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.48/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-9700T vs Core i3-8100 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-9700T vs Core i3-8100 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-9700T
Apr 23rd, 2019
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
56%
Turbo Frequency
4.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Core i3-8100
Oct 5th, 2017
Cores
4-core
50%
L3 Cache
6 MB
50%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
90%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-9700T Apr 23rd, 2019 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i3-8100 Oct 5th, 2017 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Released | Oct 5th, 2017 |
| $323.00 | MSRP | $117.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1151 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 2400 MHz (DDR4) |
| UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 630 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
