In Deathloop, the Core i7-9700T is same performance as the Core i3-6100. However, it's a much worse value for money, as it's $324 more expensive!
Core i7-9700T
- Is 3 years and 7 months newer – Apr 23, 2019 vs Sep 01, 2015
- Is 3 years and 7 months newer
- Consumes up to 31% less energy – 35 vs 51 Watts
- Consumes up to 31% less energy
Core i3-6100
- Up to 82% cheaper – $70.65 vs $394.28
- Up to 82% cheaper
- Up to 82% better value in Deathloop – $0.32 vs $1.80/FPS
- Up to 82% better value in Deathloop
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Core i7-9700T vs Core i3-6100: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-9700T
Apr 23rd, 2019
Average FPS
219 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
164 FPS
100%
Price, $
$394.28
17%
Value, $/FPS
$1.8/FPS
18%
Core i3-6100
Sep 1st, 2015
Average FPS
218 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
163 FPS
99%
Price, $
$70.65
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.32/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-9700T vs Core i3-6100 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-9700T vs Core i3-6100 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-9700T
Apr 23rd, 2019
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
54%
Turbo Frequency
4.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Core i3-6100
Sep 1st, 2015
Cores
2-core
25%
L3 Cache
4 MB
33%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
80%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-9700T Apr 23rd, 2019 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i3-6100 Sep 1st, 2015 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Released | Sep 1st, 2015 |
| $323.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1151 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 51 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 2133 MHz (DDR4) |
| UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated GPU | Intel HD 530 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
