In Control, the Core i7-9700T is same performance as the Core i3-4160. However, it's a much worse value for money, as it's $369 more expensive!
Core i7-9700T
- Is 4 years and 9 months newer – Apr 23, 2019 vs Jul 21, 2014
- Is 4 years and 9 months newer
- Consumes up to 35% less energy – 35 vs 54 Watts
- Consumes up to 35% less energy
Core i3-4160
- Up to 94% cheaper – $24.99 vs $394.28
- Up to 94% cheaper
- Up to 94% better value in Control – $0.10 vs $1.58/FPS
- Up to 94% better value in Control
Control FPS Calculator
Core i7-9700T vs Core i3-4160: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-9700T
Apr 23rd, 2019
Average FPS
248 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
163 FPS
100%
Price, $
$394.28
6%
Value, $/FPS
$1.58/FPS
6%
Core i3-4160
Jul 21st, 2014
Average FPS
247 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
162 FPS
99%
Price, $
$24.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.1/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-9700T vs Core i3-4160 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-9700T vs Core i3-4160 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-9700T
Apr 23rd, 2019
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
56%
Turbo Frequency
4.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Core i3-4160
Jul 21st, 2014
Cores
2-core
25%
L3 Cache
3 MB
25%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-9700T Apr 23rd, 2019 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i3-4160 Jul 21st, 2014 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Released | Jul 21st, 2014 |
| $323.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1150 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 54 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | DDR3 |
| UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated GPU | Intel HD 4400 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
