In Atomfall, the Core i7-9700T is slightly faster than the Core i3-4130. However, it's a much worse value for money, as it's $353 more expensive!
Core i7-9700T
- Up to 5% faster in Atomfall – 209 vs 199 FPS
- Up to 5% faster in Atomfall
- Is 5 years and 7 months newer – Apr 23, 2019 vs Sep 01, 2013
- Is 5 years and 7 months newer
- Consumes up to 35% less energy – 35 vs 54 Watts
- Consumes up to 35% less energy
Core i3-4130
- Up to 90% cheaper – $41.00 vs $394.28
- Up to 90% cheaper
- Up to 89% better value in Atomfall – $0.20 vs $1.88/FPS
- Up to 89% better value in Atomfall
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i7-9700T vs Core i3-4130: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-9700T
Apr 23rd, 2019
Average FPS
209 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
157 FPS
100%
Price, $
$394.28
10%
Value, $/FPS
$1.88/FPS
11%
Core i3-4130
Sep 1st, 2013
Average FPS
199 FPS
95%
Min 1% FPS
149 FPS
95%
Price, $
$41
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.2/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-9700T vs Core i3-4130 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-9700T vs Core i3-4130 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-9700T
Apr 23rd, 2019
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
59%
Turbo Frequency
4.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Core i3-4130
Sep 1st, 2013
Cores
2-core
25%
L3 Cache
3 MB
25%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-9700T Apr 23rd, 2019 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i3-4130 Sep 1st, 2013 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Released | Sep 1st, 2013 |
| $323.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1150 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 54 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | DDR3 |
| UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated GPU | Intel HD 4400 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
