In Atomfall, the Core i7-9700KF is slower than the Ryzen 9 9900X3D. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i7-9700KF
- Consumes up to 21% less energy – 95 vs 120 Watts
- Consumes up to 21% less energy
Ryzen 9 9900X3D
- Up to 23% faster in Atomfall – 266 vs 217 FPS
- Up to 23% faster in Atomfall
- Is 5 years and 11 months newer – Jan 06, 2025 vs Jan 08, 2019
- Is 5 years and 11 months newer
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i7-9700KF vs Ryzen 9 9900X3D: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Ryzen 9 9900X3D
Jan 6th, 2025
Average FPS
266 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
199 FPS
100%
Price, $
$569
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.13/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-9700KF vs Ryzen 9 9900X3D in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-9700KF vs Ryzen 9 9900X3D in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-9700KF
Jan 8th, 2019
Cores
8-core
67%
L3 Cache
12 MB
9%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
82%
Turbo Frequency
4.9 GHz
89%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
48%
Ryzen 9 9900X3D
Jan 6th, 2025
Cores
12-core
100%
L3 Cache
128 MB
100%
Base Frequency
4.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-9700KF Jan 8th, 2019 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen 9 9900X3D Jan 6th, 2025 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 8th, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 6th, 2025 |
$374.00 | MSRP | $599.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | AM5 |
95W | Power Consumption | 120W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | Radeon Graphics |
| Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
