In Atomfall, the Core i7-9700K is faster than the FX-6100. However, it's a much worse value for money, as it's $166 more expensive!
Core i7-9700K
- Up to 16% faster in Atomfall – 217 vs 187 FPS
- Up to 16% faster in Atomfall
- Is 7 years and 7 days newer – Oct 19, 2018 vs Oct 12, 2011
- Is 7 years and 7 days newer
FX-6100
- Up to 83% cheaper – $33.90 vs $199.99
- Up to 83% cheaper
- Up to 80% better value in Atomfall – $0.18 vs $0.92/FPS
- Up to 80% better value in Atomfall
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i7-9700K vs FX-6100: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-9700K
Oct 19th, 2018
Average FPS
217 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
163 FPS
100%
Price, $
$199.99
16%
Value, $/FPS
$0.92/FPS
20%
FX-6100
Oct 12th, 2011
Average FPS
187 FPS
86%
Min 1% FPS
140 FPS
86%
Price, $
$33.9
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.18/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-9700K vs FX-6100 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-9700K vs FX-6100 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-9700K
Oct 19th, 2018
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.9 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
FX-6100
Oct 12th, 2011
Cores
6-core
75%
L3 Cache
8 MB
67%
Base Frequency
3.3 GHz
92%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
80%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-9700K Oct 19th, 2018 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | FX-6100 Oct 12th, 2011 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Oct 19th, 2018 | Released | Oct 12th, 2011 |
| $385.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | AM3+ |
| 95 W | Power Consumption | 95 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | DDR3 |
| UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated GPU | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
