The Core i7-9700K is at least 2x faster gaming CPU than the Core i5-6500T, however, it's a much worse value for money, as it's $158.22 more expensive!
Advantages of the Core i7-9700K
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of the Core i5-6500T
- Up to 68% cheaper – $75.00 vs $233.22
- A better value for money for gaming
- Consumes up to 63% less energy – 35 vs 95 Watts
Core i7-9700K vs Core i5-6500T for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i7-9700K
Oct 19th, 2018
Average FPS
192
100%
Min 1% FPS
127
100%
Price, $
$233.22
32%
Value, $/FPS
$1.21/FPS
34%
Core i7-9700K vs Core i5-6500T in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-9700K vs Core i5-6500T in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-9700K vs Core i5-6500T in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-9700K
Oct 19th, 2018
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.9 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Core i5-6500T
Jul 2nd, 2015
Cores
4-core
50%
L3 Cache
6 MB
50%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
69%
Turbo Frequency
3.1 GHz
63%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
80%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i7-9700K | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i5-6500T |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Oct 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Jul 2nd, 2015 |
$385.00 | MSRP | Not Available |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Skylake |
95 W | Power Consumption | 35 W |
Performance | ||
8 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.6 GHz | Base Frequency | 2.5 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 3.1 GHz |
12 MB | L3 Cache | 6 MB |
Other Features | ||
DDR4 @ 2666 MHz | RAM | DDR3 @ 2133 MHz, DDR4 @ 2133 MHz |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics 530 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |