In Atomfall, the Core i7-9700F is slightly faster than the Xeon X3470. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i7-9700F
- Up to 14% faster in Atomfall – 215 vs 188 FPS
- Up to 14% faster in Atomfall
- Is 9 years and 7 months newer – Apr 23, 2019 vs Sep 08, 2009
- Is 9 years and 7 months newer
- Consumes up to 32% less energy – 65 vs 95 Watts
- Consumes up to 32% less energy
Xeon X3470
No clear advantages
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i7-9700F vs Xeon X3470: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-9700F
Apr 23rd, 2019
Average FPS
215 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
161 FPS
100%
Price, $
$247.05
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.14/FPS
100%
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-9700F vs Xeon X3470 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-9700F vs Xeon X3470 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-9700F
Apr 23rd, 2019
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Xeon X3470
Sep 8th, 2009
Cores
4-core
50%
L3 Cache
8 MB
67%
Base Frequency
2.933 GHz
98%
Turbo Frequency
3.6 GHz
77%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1333 MHz
50%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-9700F Apr 23rd, 2019 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Xeon X3470 Sep 8th, 2009 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Released | Sep 8th, 2009 |
$333.00 | MSRP | $589.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1156 |
65 W | Power Consumption | 95 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 1333 MHz (DDR3) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
