In Battlefield 6, the Core i7-9700F is slower than the Ryzen 9 5900X and it's also a worse value for money, as it's only $20 cheaper!
Core i7-9700F
- Up to 7% cheaper – $249.00 vs $269.00
- Up to 7% cheaper
- Consumes up to 38% less energy – 65 vs 105 Watts
- Consumes up to 38% less energy
Ryzen 9 5900X
- Up to 27% faster in Battlefield 6 – 104 vs 82 FPS
- Up to 27% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 1 year and 6 months newer – Nov 05, 2020 vs Apr 23, 2019
- Is 1 year and 6 months newer
- Up to 15% better value in Battlefield 6 – $2.58 vs $3.03/FPS
- Up to 15% better value in Battlefield 6
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Core i7-9700F vs Ryzen 9 5900X: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-9700F
Apr 23rd, 2019
Average FPS
82 FPS
79%
Min 1% FPS
61 FPS
78%
Price, $
$249
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.03/FPS
85%
Ryzen 9 5900X
Nov 5th, 2020
Average FPS
104 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
78 FPS
100%
Price, $
$269
92%
Value, $/FPS
$2.58/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-9700F vs Ryzen 9 5900X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-9700F vs Ryzen 9 5900X in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-9700F
Apr 23rd, 2019
Cores
8-core
67%
L3 Cache
12 MB
19%
Base Frequency
3 GHz
81%
Turbo Frequency
4.7 GHz
98%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
83%
Ryzen 9 5900X
Nov 5th, 2020
Cores
12-core
100%
L3 Cache
64 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-9700F Apr 23rd, 2019 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen 9 5900X Nov 5th, 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Apr 23rd, 2019 | Released | Nov 5th, 2020 |
$333.00 | MSRP | $549.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | AM4 |
65 W | Power Consumption | 105 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
