The Core i7-9700F is a clear winner – it's at least 2x faster gaming CPU than the FX-8320E and it's also a much better value for money, as it's only $77.98 more expensive!
Advantages of the Core i7-9700F
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- A much better value for money for gaming
- Consumes up to 32% less energy – 65 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of the FX-8320E
- Up to 30% cheaper – $178.02 vs $256.00
- Has an integrated GPU, while the Core i7-9700F cannot run games without a dedicated GPU
Core i7-9700F vs FX-8320E for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i7-9700F
Apr 23rd, 2019
Average FPS
190
100%
Min 1% FPS
125
100%
Price, $
$256
69%
Value, $/FPS
$1.34/FPS
79%
Core i7-9700F vs FX-8320E in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-9700F vs FX-8320E in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-9700F vs FX-8320E in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-9700F
Apr 23rd, 2019
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3 GHz
94%
Turbo Frequency
4.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
FX-8320E
Sep 2nd, 2014
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
67%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
85%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
70%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i7-9700F | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | FX-8320E |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Sep 2nd, 2014 |
| $333.00 | MSRP | $147.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
| Coffee Lake | Codename | Vishera |
65 W | Power Consumption | 95 W |
| Performance | ||
| 8 | Cores | 8 |
| 8 | Threads | 8 |
| 3.0 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.2 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 4.0 GHz |
12 MB | L3 Cache | 8 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR4 @ 2666 MHz | RAM | DDR3 @ 1866 MHz |
| No | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
